The collegial model in organizational behaviour (OB) is a framework built on partnership and teamwork, where managers and employees collaborate as colleagues, fostering mutual respect and shared responsibility. Collegial is an adjective describing a work environment where responsibility and authority is shared equally by colleagues. This model encourages a sense of partnership, with managers acting as joint contributors and employees feeling a sense of fulfilment and responsibility, leading to self-discipline and moderate enthusiasm for high-quality work. Managers are called joint contributors because their role involves a blend of individual contributions (their own specific tasks, plans, and expertise) and the collective contribution of the teams they lead. They facilitate the work of others while also making individual, specialized contributions to the organization is an extension of the supportive model and works effectively in dynamic environments like a creative team. 

Samsung has an organizational culture that emphasizes innovation through empowering employees and fostering teamwork. This collegial model utilizes flat hierarchies, shared decision-making, and cross-functional teams to promote collaboration and innovation. The collegial model in organizational behaviour focuses on promoting teamwork and a sense of shared responsibility among colleagues. Samsung incorporates several elements of this model into its operations. Samsung utilizes flatter organizational structures to encourage open communication and reduce status-based conflicts. Managers are encouraged to act as coaches or team members, promoting team performance and ensuring a positive, motivating work environment rather than a strictly hierarchical one.

Collegial models work the best in educational Institutions. Schools and colleges, particularly at the primary level or within specific departments like university faculties like faculty of science, faculty of commerce, management, law etc. They often adopt a collegial approach for policy and curriculum decisions.

Similarly in the non-profit organizations (NGOs) like Goonj, Nanhi Kali, CRY, and the Akshaya Patra Foundation, which rely on volunteerism and shared humanitarian goals, inherently leverage the self-actualization and teamwork principles of the collegial model to drive their initiatives. The most famous examples of universities that primarily use the collegial model of governance are the UK’s ancient institutions, the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge.

Some of key principles of the collegial model are as follows:

Partnership:

The foundation is a partnership between employees and management, where everyone is a “colleague” working towards common goals. In the collegial model, partnership is the foundation where managers and employees work together as colleagues with a shared purpose. This approach emphasizes teamwork and mutual contribution, fostering a collaborative environment where responsibility and decision-making are shared, leading to greater employee motivation and commitment.

Teamwork:

A team-based approach is emphasized, with a focus on collaboration and shared responsibility. This model emphasizes collaboration, shared decision-making, and self-discipline over traditional hierarchical structures, motivating employees by meeting their psychological needs for self-actualization and contribution.

Mutual respect:

The model promotes a culture of mutual respect between managers and employees, breaking down traditional hierarchical barriers. Mutual respect is not merely an optional courtesy but a core, driving force for motivation and a strong, positive organizational culture. Without it, the model struggles to function effectively, as trust and open communication are essential for its success.

Managerial role:

Managers are seen as joint contributors and facilitators, focusing on guiding employees and promoting a sense of participation and cooperation.

Employee orientation:

Employees are oriented toward responsible behaviour and self-discipline, driven by an internal obligation to produce high-quality work.

Psychological result:

Employees experience a sense of fulfilment and self-actualization, which leads to moderate enthusiasm and commitment to the organization’s success. Psychology in organizational behaviour is the application of psychological principles to understand and improve the workplace. It studies how individual, group, and structural factors influence behaviour within organizations, focusing on areas like employee motivation, job satisfaction, productivity, and well-being.

Examples of organization using collegial model:

The Murugappa Group is a Chennai-based Indian conglomerate with diverse businesses in engineering, agriculture, financial services, and manufacturing. Founded in 1900, the group is one of India’s oldest business legacies and is managed by the Murugappa family, with prominent companies including Carborundum Universal, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance, Coromandel International, and Tube Investments of India. Its business interests span a wide range, from abrasives and auto components to bicycles, fertilizers, sugar, and tea.  It is a family-promoted conglomerate with over 125 years of history; the Murugappa Group has grown from a banking and money lending business to a diversified industrial powerhouse. Murugappa group uses the collegial OB model.

Dabur India Ltd operates with a work environment and talent management practices that are described as fostering a culture of collegiality. This approach emphasizes teamwork, mutual trust, and a cohesive work environment rather than strictly following a formal, top-down “collegial model” as a rigid organizational structure. Dabur India Ltd. is a leading Indian multinational consumer goods company, founded in 1884, that specializes in Ayurvedic and natural healthcare products. Headquartered in Ghaziabad, it is one of the world’s largest Ayurvedic and natural healthcare companies and has a vast portfolio of over 250 products across hair care, oral care, health care, and foods. Dabur has a global presence in over 120 countries and is known for its flagship brands like Dabur, Vatika, Hajmola, and Real.  

PERT – Program Evaluation and Review Technique and CPM (Critical Path Method) are project management tools for scheduling and controlling projects by breaking them into smaller tasks and analysing their dependencies. PERT is used for projects which usually are run with uncertain activity durations. PERT charts are used using a probabilistic model with optimistic, most likely, and doubtful time estimates. CPM is used for projects with known, deterministic durations, focusing on time-cost by balancing  trade-offs to find the critical path. 

Kingfisher Airlines didn’t give importance to PERT charts. The airline’s eventual collapse was ascribed to a lack of proper PERT procedure in terms of delegation, scheduling of flights, food arrangements and other services in flights. Aircraft maintenance, pilot and aircraft staff duties, scheduling of their work, misbehaviour of staff, and a lack of attention from the owner, highlighting fundamental failures in project management that no planning technique could overcome without proper execution and governance.

A study of ten failed PPP highway cases in India cited issues such as unreasonable traffic and revenue estimates, inflexible contracts, unbalanced risk allocation, regulatory hold-ups, and limited oversight. These systemic flaws in planning and risk management directly relate to the potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on initial PERT estimates without continuous monitoring and adjustment. PERT requires regular monitoring. The projects include the Delhi-Mumbai Expressway, Nagpur Metro Rail, Navi Mumbai International Airport, GIFT City, and the development of Multi-Modal Logistics Hubs in Greater Noida. Other examples include the Operation, Management and Development (OMD) of Multimodal Terminal (MMT) at Varanasi, the development of the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) – Udaipur infrastructure, the Redevelopment of Gwalior and Amritsar Railway Stations, and the construction of Eco-Tourism Resorts in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.

PERT requires detailed purpose. Projects with uncertain timeframes, such as research and development, by focusing on minimizing project completion time are dangerous. PERT timeline uses a probabilistic approach with three time estimates for each activity: optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic.  It is concerned primarily with time and risk assessment, allowing for contingency planning.  It is best for projects with a high degree of uncertainty and a non-linear or unpredictable flow of activities.

The Critical Path Method (CPM) is crucial in project management because it helps identify the longest sequence of dependent tasks to determine the minimum project completion time. This allows project managers to effectively prioritize tasks, allocate resources, track progress, and proactively mitigate risks to ensure timely project delivery. By highlighting critical tasks that cannot be delayed, CPM provides a clear roadmap and facilitates better communication, helping to avoid bottlenecks and schedule delays.

The Bullet Train Project (Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail project has been analysed using both CPM and PERT in research papers to examine critical activities, interdependencies, and estimated timelines, demonstrating the application of these tools in large-scale, high-value infrastructure planning. For construction of rail tracks, the general application of CPM and PERT in the construction of railway lines has been studied, showcasing how these techniques help optimize schedules, manage costs, and ensure timely completion of complex track-laying activities.

The purpose of CPM is to manage projects with predictable activity durations and focuses on balancing time and cost. It uses a deterministic approach with a single, fixed time estimate for each activity. CPM focuses and identifies the critical path—the longest sequence of tasks to ensure timely project completion and explores time-cost trade-offs. It is best for projects with well-defined tasks and durations, such as construction and manufacturing.

While working on large infrastructure and construction projects publicly detailed PERT charts are less common in general descriptions, the nature of India’s major infrastructure drives, such as the Bharatmala Pariyojana (a massive national highways program), the Mumbai Trans Harbour Link, and various other large-scale building and engineering projects, necessitates the use of robust project management methodologies like PERT/CPM for effective planning and execution. Software tools like Primavera P6 (commonly used for engineering and construction) are leveraged for such high-budget projects, which inherently integrate PERT-like functionalities for risk and uncertainty visualization.

Conclusion

Both tools of project management PERT and CPM are often used together because they are complementary. They both involve creating a project network diagram to visualize tasks and dependencies. They help project managers break down large projects, determine the critical path, make decisions, coordinate teams, and analyse if the project will be completed within budget.

In the corporate world bandwidth refers to the capacity of an employee to complete a task in give time frame with accuracy. An organization expects their employees to complete a task with available resources, handle tasks alertly, handle projects with finesse, maintain transparency and proper flow of information within a business context. It can refer to the physical capacity of a network to communicate the flow of data related to workload and the ability to address a complex situation. To me, a high-bandwidth person is one who can rapidly intake information, synthesize it, and communicate efficiently. To explain bandwidth in HR I have given example of Mr. Punit Chatwal a renowned Hospitality Industry champion.

Puneet Chatwal of Indian Hotels Company Ltd MD & CEO has large bandwidth of multitasking and ambition to grow IHCL since 2017, the company got on board a very aggressive target of 50 percent growth in the number of hotels. Since then, they have added 70 new hotels to their portfolio. Primarily, this has been driven through strategy, focus, a change in business model, and a culture of rewarding performance. As the company has grown, they have been strengthening the culture of the company. Chatwal is  disciplined and a visionary.

Networking is vital for professional and personal development because it raises connections, facilitates knowledge sharing, and creates opportunities for growth. It expands a person’s   reach for opportunities, provides valuable advice and support, and enhances his  professional reputation. Human bandwidth refers to the amount of mental and emotional capacity a person has available to process information, make decisions, and handle various tasks and challenges at any given time. It’s a limited resource, like time or physical energy, and when it’s depleted, individuals may have trouble focusing, making decisions, or managing stress. Puneet Chhatwal is a people’s man; he is frequently described as a leader who values people and is focused on building strong relationships within his organization and in the hospitality industry.  

Bandwidth is often used as a metaphor for the available time, energy, and resources to take on new responsibilities. When someone says, “I don’t have the bandwidth,” they often mean they don’t have the capacity and energy to handle additional work. This can relate to the number of ongoing projects, workload, or the complexity of tasks.

As leaders, manager, it is very important to know that everyone has a different capacity. For example, if it takes one person to complete a certain task in one hour, it can take the other 3-4 hours. Managers must assign the work to each team member according to what they can handle.

Bandwidth in HRM signifies an employee’s ability to manage a workload, process information, and make decisions within a specific timeframe. It includes mental energy, emotional stability, and time that an employee can allocate to work. Bandwidth affects an employee’s ability to prioritize tasks, meet deadlines, and handle the complexities of their role. When an employee’s bandwidth is stretched thin (e.g., due to excessive workload, high stress, or lack of support), it can lead to burnout, decreased productivity, and reduced decision-making quality. 

Puneet Chatwal says that his people are fundamental to the desirable brand equity enjoyed by IHCL. He involved 40 of our senior leaders in creating the ambitious 5-year business strategy. This was supported by ‘culture meets’ that helped in fostering an environment of collaboration and teamwork. It has helped people to take accountability and become highly engaged and invested in the company’s success. Chatwal is known for understanding people he is future proofing the talent to ensure they are ready for the growth that is coming from within the industry and IHCL’s aggressive pipeline. He believes in Leadership Pipeline Model of HR. The model does not need to hire stars from outside for the key positions. Outsiders clog the pipeline because of the culture they bring does not go well the organizational culture. 

Conclusion: Bandwidth is not will power, a person can’t just think harder to get more.  Bandwidth is not intelligence or knowledge you can’t educate yourself into more. Bandwidth is not time; we can’t control it so easily. Bandwidth is more like the physiological limit of how much “thinking” we can do in one moment.  When bandwidth demands are high, but bandwidth availability is low, what happens then?  Usually it means we are weaker, we are experiencing a burnout, we are fagged out and we will fall short of the expected quality of work.

The Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) refers to the poorest two-thirds of the global population which is over 4 billion people living on less than $2 or $5 a day. Popularized by C.K. Prahalad in 2004, it represents an untapped, high-volume market. Businesses target this segment with affordable, high-volume, low-margin products (e.g., small shampoo sachets) to ease poverty while generating profit.  Roughly two-thirds of the population, or about 68%, live on less than $5 per day. The global Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP) consists of approximately 4 billion people living in poverty, typically defined as those with incomes below $2.50 to $3.00 per day. This segment represents the largest, yet poorest, socio-economic group, often characterized as a major market opportunity. Roughly 4 billion people, representing the bottom two-thirds of the economic pyramid. This segment is characterized by subsistence-level income, high levels of informality in labor, and low literacy rates. It’s the lowest income tier (tier 3 and 4) of the global economic pyramid.

Market Opportunity

The collective purchasing power of the poor is immense, its voluminous creating a “fortune” for companies that can design sustainable, scalable business models, such as small-packet shampoos, low-cost banking, or affordable health services. The market size is roughly 4 billion people, primarily in Asia, Africa, and South America. The BoP is highly price-sensitive, often with irregular income streams.

While offering immense growth potential as a battleground for corporate revenue, BoP markets present challenges like poor infrastructure, which makes distribution costly.

Micro-distribution

Using local, community-based networks (e.g., selling through local women in rural areas) eg. Project Shakti of HUL. Even a kiosk (tapari)  business is a high-traffic, low-overhead retail model located in busy streets, offering products or services through small, often self-service booths. It offers a cost-effective entry for entrepreneurs, with opportunities in food, retail, or tech, often allowing for flexible, mobile, or fixed setups. Key success factors include prime location, eye-catching design, and efficient inventory. Allowing consumers with daily income to purchase products they cannot afford in large, upfront quantities in sachets.

Kiosks allow utilizing technology to offer services like telecom or solar power in small, manageable increments. They act as local solutions leveraging local knowledge and resources to create sustainable local enterprise networks.

FMCG products are the top-selling category

FMCG products are often sold in micro-packaging to reduce upfront costs for low-income consumers. Sachets, or single-use, small-unit packaging, are a foundation of marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP)the largest but poorest socio-economic group. These products are designed for consumers with limited daily cash flow, allowing them to purchase branded goods in small quantities at affordable prices. Personal care products such as shampoos, soaps (e.g., Lifebuoy), toothpastes (e.g., Colgate), hair oils, and fairness creams. Detergents and cleaning soaps powder detergents (e.g., Nirma) and dishwashing soaps. And, edible items such as cooking oils, tea, spices, and sugar. To make the product accessible to BoP, Maggi introduced smaller packs at low, affordable price points, such as ₹5 (Chotu Maggi) and ₹10, allowing for impulse purchases. Companies such as Hindustan Unilever (HUL), Procter & Gamble (P&G), CavinKare, Dabur, Britannia, and Nestle use this approach to penetrate rural markets and, increasingly, to combat the rising cost of living in urban areas. Examples include small pouches for detergent (Surf Excel), shampoo sachets (Sunsilk), and small biscuits/snack packs (Good Day).

In many developing markets, small neighbourhood stores (“sari-sari” stores in the Philippines, kirana stores in India) are the primary source of goods, which perfectly suits the distribution of single-use sachets.

Functional and affordable technology

BoP consumers are eager to adopt technologies that improve their quality of life or productivity. Low-Cost mobile handsets: Budget-friendly, feature-packed mobile phones, especially from brands like Micromax, Spice, and Nokia. Solar-Powered lights and devices like D. Light provide essential, sustainable, and portable lighting and phone charging capabilities. Low-Cost household appliances low-energy products like the “ChotuKool” refrigerator. Chotukool is an innovative approach to tackling the problem of food storage in India, a country in which around one-third of all food spoils and an estimated 80 percent of households do not have access to or use a refrigerator. Chotukool is the brainchild of Gopalan Sunderraman, Executive Vice President of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing.

Success at the BoP often requires reinventing the business model, not just the product. The model emphasizes that innovations should be co-created with the BoP consumers, shifting from “selling to the poor” to “working with the poor”.  For example, Tata Nano, Tata Ace is re-engineering automobiles for affordability. Aravind Eye Care System is  High-volume, low-cost eye surgeries. The strategy has made the eye-care hospital stand out as an ethical when it provides products that improve quality of life, such as basic health, hygiene, or connectivity solutions.

Bottom of Pyramid Business Model is Huge

Consisting of over 4 billion people, this market is not small; it constitutes most of the global population. BoP consumers are highly price-sensitive, yet value-conscious. They often require specialized products (e.g., smaller packaging) and yet are value-conscious. They exist in rural and informal urban economies. The market is estimated at around trillion annually, grows faster than the global GDP. It is considered a source of innovation, offering opportunities for companies to create shared value. Most of this population is concentrated in developing nations, with significant populations in China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia. Consumption at the BoP is often described as “frugal in size but voluminous in total,” meaning products are sold in small quantities like sachets to a vast number of people, leading to high total sales revenue. The population at the bottom of the pyramid is projected to swell to more than 6 billion people over the next 40 years as global population growth remains concentrated in this segment.

Conclusion

The “fortune” at the bottom of the pyramid, popularised by C.K. Prahalad, suggests that businesses can simultaneously drive profits and lessen poverty by treating this segment as consumers rather than merely as victims of poverty.

Studying international business theories is essential to steer, strategize, and succeed in a globalized economy, enabling professionals to understand complex trade dynamics, manage cross-cultural risks, and identify international growth opportunities. These theories provide the analytical tools needed to optimize supply chains, enhance competitiveness, and formulate effective, sustainable global strategies.

The theories can be classified into: Classical Country-Based Theories: Mercantilism, Absolute Advantage, Comparative Advantage and Heckher-Ohlin Theory. Modern Firm-Based Theories: Country Similarity, Product Life Cycle, Global Strategic Rivalry and Porter’s National Competitive Advantage.

Mercantilism

It is a form of economic system and nationalist economic policy that is designed to maximize the exports and minimize the imports of an economy. It seeks to maximize the accumulation of resources within the country and use those resources for one-sided trade.

It is also known as “commercialism,” which is a system in which a country attempts to amass wealth through trade with other countries, exporting more than it imports and increasing stores of gold and precious metals. It is often considered an outdated system.

The biggest example being Passed by the British Parliament in May 1773, the Tea Act was a mercantilist policy designed to bail out the struggling British East India Company by granting it a monopoly on tea sales in the American colonies. It allowed the company to ship tea directly to America, bypassing merchants and reducing costs, while enforcing a three-cent tax to assert Parliament’s taxing authority. The Act aimed to save the financially troubled British East India Company by allowing it to dump 17 million pounds of unsold tea in American markets, creating a practical monopoly.  Ships carrying tea were also turned away or had their tea destroyed in New York, Philadelphia, and Charleston. The Tea Act was effectively the world’s first corporate bailout (often helping by paying money in difficult situation) the act was designed to save the East India Company from bankruptcy.

Mercantilist economic policies rely on government intervention to restrict imports and protect domestic industries. Modern-day mercantilist policies include tariffs, subsidizing domestic industries, devaluation of currencies, and restrictions on the migration of foreign labor.

Modern-day mercantilism in India is reflected in policies prioritizing domestic manufacturing, reducing import dependency, and fostering a trade surplus, often termed “neo-mercantilism” or economic nationalism. Key examples include the Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) initiative, the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, high tariffs on imports, and the decision to stay out of the RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership)  trade agreement to protect domestic sectors.

Absolute Advantage

The ability of a country to produce more of a good with the same resources than another country is absolute advantage. India has an absolute advantage in the production of wheat over China and China has an absolute advantage in the production of cloth over India. Absolute advantage in international business occurs when a country can produce more of a good or service with raw material or technology which the country enjoys. It represents superior efficiency due to factors like better technology, climate, or lower labor costs.

Due to abundant oil reserves, Saudi Arabia can produce oil at a much lower cost and in higher volume than most countries, giving it an absolute advantage. China has historically held an absolute advantage in textile production due to a large workforce, lower labor costs, and efficient manufacturing capacity. Japan possesses an absolute advantage in high-end electronics manufacturing owing to its advanced technology and highly skilled workforce.

Comparative Advantage

It is the ability of a country to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost than another country by achieving  economies of scale. Reductions in average costs due to increased production levels. For example, China’s low labor costs give it a comparative advantage as a manufacturer over many Western trading partners. South Africa has a comparative advantage in mining because of its mineral wealth.

Brazil has a comparative advantage in coffee production due to climate, while South Africa holds an advantage in mining due to mineral abundance. Germany and Japan have a comparative advantage in automobile manufacturing and high-end machinery due to advanced technology and highly skilled labor, despite higher production costs. India has a comparative advantage in software development and IT services due to a large pool of educated, English-speaking, and cost-efficient professionals, which the U.S. imports.

Eli Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin Theory

It is also known as factor-proportions theory. Both prepared a theory explaining international trade patterns by focusing on differences in factor like cheap labor, raw material, and capital between countries, suggesting that countries export goods using their abundant, cheaper factors and import goods which are scarce.

Bangladesh specializes in clothing (labour-intensive), while Germany exports machinery (capital-intensive). A country with abundant labor (e.g., India) tends to produce and export textiles, while a capital-abundant country (e.g., Germany) specializes in automobile production. While South Korea was historically labor-abundant, it successfully transitioned to capital-intensive exports (electronics) by investing in infrastructure.

Modern & Firm based theories:

Raymond Vernon’s Product Life Cycle (PLC) theory

This explains how trade patterns shift as products evolve from innovation in developed nations to mass production and standardization in developing countries, moving through introduction, growth, maturity, and decline stages. The theory explains how a product’s production and trade patterns shift over time, eventually leading the original innovating country to become an importer of the very product it invented. As the name suggests, this theory talks about a product that goes through different stages. This theory only focuses on the developed nation, not on the developing nation.  According to this theory, when a product is in its early life cycle stage, all the raw material and the labor used in making and producing that product belong to the place where the product has been invented or produced. But when that new product is introduced in the world market, then its area of origin shifts to different places

PC Personal computer) were introduced to world by US; its mass manufacturing in low-cost Asian countries declined production in US. Now US purchases Pcs from Asian countries.

Country Similarity Theory (Steffan Linder)

Trade within similar development stages (intra-industry trade) occurs due to similar consumer preferences. states that countries with similar income levels, consumer habits, and industrial development trade similar, high-quality manufactured goods with each other (intra-industry trade). Key examples include massive trade in automobiles between Germany and France, or electronics between the US and Canada.

Global Strategic Rivalry (Krugman/Lancaster)

Firms gain competitive advantage through innovation, R&D, and economies of scale, influencing trade patterns. Competition for leadership in semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and 5G networks, often involving sanctions, export restrictions, and investments in critical infrastructure.

Porter’s Diamond Model

National competitive advantage stems from four interconnected factors: factor conditions, demand conditions, related/supporting industries, and firm strategy/rivalry. Germany’s automotive industry, showcasing strong national advantage through skilled engineers (Factor Conditions), demanding consumers wanting high-performance cars (Demand Conditions), a robust supply chain (Related/Supporting Industries), and intense rivalry between BMW, Mercedes, and Audi driving innovation (Firm Strategy/Rivalry).

The Easterlin Paradox, formulated by Richard Easterlin formulated in 1974, describes the evident contradiction between increased national wealth and increased average happiness levels. While individuals with higher incomes tend to report higher happiness levels within a specific time frame, a country’s average happiness does not necessarily increase over time as its overall income grows.  We apply common corelation between accumulated wealth and happiness.  People with higher incomes tend to be happier than those with lower incomes.

Despite the positive correlation within a point in time, the average happiness levels in a country do not consistently increase as the country’s overall income rises. This is the paradoxical part: while individuals may be happier at higher income levels, the overall happiness level of a country doesn’t necessarily follow fit as the country’s income grows. 

Richard Easterlin, then professor of economics at the University of Pennsylvania is the first economist to study happiness data. The paradox states that at a point in time happiness varies directly with income both among and within nations, but over time happiness does not trend upward as income continues to grow. Higher incomes don’t produce greater happiness over time. One explanation is that one’s happiness depends on a variety of other factors such as family and social connect, pollution less environment, hobbies of life, sufficient food, get together with friends etc.

In the short run, everyone perceives increases in income to be correlated with happiness and tries to increase their incomes. However, in the long run, this proves to be an illusion, since everyone’s efforts to raise standards of living lead to increasing averages, leaving everyone in the same place in terms of relative income. Various theories have been advanced to explain the paradox, but the paradox itself is solely an empirical theory. The existence of the paradox has been strongly disputed by other researchers.

Richard Easterlin has updated the evidence and description of the paradox over time. His most recent contribution is from 2022. This article is corelation between Easterlin’s Paradox and happiness index.  

According to the World Happiness Report and various other sources, Finland is consistently ranked as the happiest country in the world. In the 2025 report, Finland has been ranked number one for the eighth year in a row. Possibly, this happiness comes because Finns enjoy simple pleasures like clean air, pure water and walking around the woods, they enjoy their lives to the fullest. They enjoy a calm and peaceful life. it’s their appreciation for how things work and the ability to pause and admire the little things in life. In Finland, anyone can pick berries, collect mushrooms or fish with a simple fishing rod. It is part of  each citizen’s rights, which state that everyone is free to enjoy nature responsibly. Finland is cleanest in the world. The food that grows wild is delicious and fresh. Finding the luxury produce in the wild  like porcini mushrooms or cloud berries is considered a delightful moment and makes for an even more heavenly dinner. Finnish happiness is explained by the high levels of trust and freedom in its society, which research shows contributes to well-being and productivity.

In the 2025 World Happiness Report, Afghanistan consistently ranks as the unhappiest country in the world. Specifically, in the 2025 report, it is ranked 147th out of 147 countries. This ranking indicates that Afghanistan has the lowest happiness score and experiences the most frequent negative emotions, as well as the lowest frequency of positive emotions. 

The World Happiness Index Report is an annual publication of the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network which contains rankings of national happiness and analysis of the data from various perspectives. The first World Happiness Report was released in April 2012. In a high-level meeting of UN well-being and Happiness were defined as new economic paradigms which drew international attention.

An Internet report suggested that if you want happiness, buy a scarf and gloves and head to Norway to experience real happiness.  Norway is well-known for its good public services and political stability. Denmark is another country which is famous for happiness nurtured in its culture. Danes have a stable government, little public corruption, and access to high-quality education and health care. The country does have the highest taxes in the world, but the citizens happily pay the taxes because they believe higher taxes can create a better society. Let’s understand what Happiness Index is.

What makes people of a country happy? Is it economy? Is it environment? Is it education? Is it government policies? We’ll all of these do contribute to people’s happiness in a country. But it is not necessary to be higher economic pace and growth always. People are happier when they don’t experience inequality in distribution of wealth; people don’t mind paying taxes when there is fairness in tax structure. People are happy when government practices transparency in the implementing policies. People want safety, people want welfare, people want gooinfrastructure, hygiene and people want good quality education.

Corruption undermines government revenue and, therefore, limits the capacity of the government to invest in productive areas.  Corruption distorts the decision-making in public investment projects. It’s been observed the higher the level of corruption in a country, the larger the share of its economic activity that will go subversive, beyond the reach of the tax authorities. Corruption discourages entrepreneurship and innovation; it only encourages inefficiency. It dislocates the human resources.  It creates uncertainty among the citizens. And it diminishes legitimacy in all walks of life and increases crimes.

In all countries there are rich and poor; but when the levels of inequality are low, and the welfare systems are strong, the citizens are happy. People don’t mind paying higher taxes for living a happier life.

The report primarily uses data from the Gallup World Poll. Gallup is a credible polling organization. It is respected highly in media. Nevertheless, all research including polling have some weaknesses which depend on the various methodologies and details of the poll and its questionnaires. Each research has few statistical limitations. Gallup ensures that each annual report is available to the public to download on the World Happiness Report website.

Happiness index is measured using parameters like Housing, Income, Work, Community, Civic Engagement, Education, Environment, Health, Life Satisfaction, Safety and Life-Work balance etc. Each report is organized by chapters that delve deeper into issues relating to happiness. The chapters also include mental illness, the objective benefits of happiness, the importance of ethics, policy implications which lead to subjective wellbeing. The report is based on how strong a country’s social foundation and social trust is.

Bhutan is one of the Buddhist Kingdoms in the World and so far, has preserved much of their culture since the 17th century. Even with globalization, Bhutan follows its Buddhist culture. It allows a certain number of foreigners into the country each year, and the two hundred dollars a day that must be paid by every traveller is a deterrent for many. Internet, television, and western dress were banned from the country up until ten years ago. But over the past ten years globalization has proved to be a challenge to this tiny nation. Things have begun to change, but they are trying to balance things in their own way.

Bhutan is the only country in the world that has a ‘GNH’ which is “Gross National Happiness.” The process of measuring GNH began when Bhutan opened to globalization. It measures people’s quality of life and makes sure that both material and spiritual development happen together in its citizen’s lives. Bhutan has balanced it rightly so far

Conclusion

Happiness is very important to both individuals and as a country. A happy individual is productive and creative. As human beings, although we possess cognitive abilities and are highly “thought” oriented, the quality of our lives is determined by our emotions. The Easterlin Paradox states happiness varies directly with income, both among and within nations, but over time the long-term growth rates of happiness and income are not significantly related. The principal reason for the contradiction is social comparison. A happy human is emotionally strong because happiness protects heart, it strengthens immune system, it helps in combating stress, it found that happy people have fewer aches and pains. The idea that “money can’t buy happiness” is a widely held belief, often attributed to the belief that true happiness comes from things like relationships, personal fulfilment, and a sense of purpose. .  In  the World Happiness Report 2025, India is ranked 118th out of 147 countries.

The supply chain is as important as a backbone of businesses and the global economy, connecting raw material sources to the end consumer by managing the flow of goods and information, ensuring efficiency, quality, and timely delivery. This intricate system is crucial for providing products, boosting economic activity, modifying risks like disasters and geopolitical events, fostering innovation, and creating a competitive advantage for businesses.

Supply chain risks can cause big problems for firms. These risks come in many forms. Natural disasters, cyber-attacks, and supplier issues can all disrupt the flow of goods. The COVID-19 pandemic showed how fragile supply chains can be. Many companies struggled to get parts and materials. This led to empty shelves and angry customers. To cope, firms need to build supply chain resilience. This means having backup plans and suppliers. It also means using tech to spot problems early. Smart firms keep extra stock of key items too.

The bullwhip effect is a phenomenon in supply chain management where small changes in consumer demand create increasingly enlarged and distorted order quantities as they move up the supply chain from retailers to wholesalers to manufacturers. This exaggeration of demand leads to excess or insufficient inventory, higher costs, and reduced efficiency. It occurs because each stage in the supply chain lacks perfect information about actual consumer demand and tends to overreact to perceived changes, creating a ripple effect like a whip’s increasing motion.

The term “Bullwhip Effect” was first coined by Procter & Gamble researchers in the early 1990s. It described the phenomenon they observed in the supply chain for their Pampers brand diapers. They noticed that small changes amplified consumer demand as they moved up the supply chain, leading to significant inefficiencies and increased costs.

The bullwhip effect in a supply chain is when small changes in final consumer demand are magnified into increasingly larger fluctuations in orders as they move upstream to distributors, wholesalers, and manufacturers. This distortion causes parties to overcompensate for perceived changes in demand, leading to inefficient overproduction, excess inventory, stockouts, increased costs, and supply chain disruptions.

P&G experienced though the demand for their best-selling Pampers diapers was stable, the orders placed by retailers, distributors, and their own suppliers showed progressively larger fluctuations, leading to inefficiencies like excess inventory and increased costs. P&G coined the term to highlight this phenomenon, which they and other companies recognized as a major cause of inefficiencies in their supply chains. 

Common supply chain problems include material and labor shortages, logistics challenges like port congestion and rising transport costs, demand and supply imbalances, lack of visibility, geopolitical instability, and cybersecurity threats. These issues can lead to increased costs, operational disruptions, delays in delivery, and negative impacts on customer satisfaction. Some common problems for bullwhip are as follows: 

Demand Change at the Customer Level

A minor shift in consumer purchases occurs. A change in customer-level demand can disrupt a supply chain by creating sudden imbalances, leading to stockouts or excess inventory and increasing costs for businesses. This happens because the supply chain, which amplifies demand variability, struggles to react quickly enough to unexpected shifts, whether they are sudden surges or unexpected drops in demand.

Retailer Overreaction

The retailer, lacking full visibility into demand, overreacts to the perceived trend by increasing or decreasing their orders to the distributor by a larger margin. When retailers overreact to market conditions, they can cause supply chain disruptions through sudden spikes in demand (leading to shortages) or sudden drops in demand (leading to excess inventory). Overreactions, such as stockpiling or sudden order cuts, disrupt the flow of goods, causing higher costs, production halts, and potential loss of supplier and customer confidence. Effective supply chain management requires real-time visibility and intelligent demand forecasting to avoid these disruptions and ensure a smooth flow of products.

Amplified Orders Upstream

The wholesaler, receiving distorted information from multiple retailers, further inflates its own orders to the manufacturer. Where small fluctuations in customer demand become increasingly amplified as they move upstream from the retailer to the wholesaler, distributor, and manufacturer. This distortion leads to inefficiencies like excess inventory or shortages, increased costs, and operational instability, as each supply chain stage.

Magnified Demand Fluctuation

The manufacturer, with even less direct information about customer demand, drastically adjusts its production and orders from suppliers, creating the largest and most erratic swing.

Complex Supply Chain

The number of intermediaries between the manufacturer and the ultimate customer grows with a complex supply chain. Each intermediary may make assumptions about demand in a complex supply chain and place orders accordingly. Due to the sheer number of interconnected and interdependent entities, the vast amount of information and material flows involved, the global reach and multiple geographic locations of these entities, and the constant dynamic changes and disruptions that occur, making cause-and-effect relationships often unclear. These factors create a system with many moving parts that require significant coordination and can lead to cascading effects when problems arise.

Batch Orders

Batch order is a common practice in supply chain management where orders are placed in bulk at set intervals. The supplier and the retailer or distributor agree on a schedule for placing orders rather than placing orders as demand occurs. Batch ordering creates a distorted view of actual demand. This distortion of information leads to an excess inventory, which causes a stock-out or increase in holding costs. It can also lead to the bullwhip effect by creating a delay in the flow of information. This delay causes suppliers to react to changes in demand too late, leading to an oversupply or stock-out.

Consumer Pressure

Consumer pressure can cause the bullwhip effect by creating demand fluctuations that are difficult for suppliers to predict and address. It happens when consumers pressure retailers to stock a wide range of products and always have those products available. Consumer pressure leads to an overestimated demand and an increase in inventory levels. When consumers pressure retailers to stock a wide range of products, retailers place large orders to ensure they have enough supply to meet consumer demands.

Bad Communication

Distorted communication directly causes supply chain disruption by creating misaligned expectations, increasing operational costs, and leading to poor decision-making, which results in delays, shortages, and damaged relationships. This breakdown in information flow, especially in global networks, can be due to incompatible systems, data silos, security issues like cyber-attacks, or a general lack of real-time, transparent information exchange, hindering agile responses to unexpected events. It creates a lack of visibility and coordination among supply chain partners. It makes it difficult for suppliers to accurately predict demand and make informed inventory management and production levels decisions. Poor communication can lead to an overestimated demand and an increase in inventory levels, causing the bullwhip effect.

Price Volatility

Price volatility refers to the degree of price variations of a product or commodity over time. It measures how much the price of a product or commodity changes in each period.  Price volatility causes the bullwhip effect by creating uncertainty and unpredictability for suppliers. The rapid fluctuation in the price of a product or commodity makes it hard for suppliers to forecast future prices. This volatility causes them to overestimate demand, leading to an increase in inventory levels and the bullwhip effect in supply.

Lead Times Issues

Lead time is the time it takes for order fulfilment, from placing an order until the goods are received. Long lead times create delays in the flow of information between supply chain partners. This delay makes it difficult for suppliers to accurately predict demand and make informed inventory and production levels decisions. For example, if a supplier has long lead times, a retailer may place large safety stock orders to ensure they have enough inventory.

Incorrect Forecasts

Suppliers, retailers, and distributors often use historical data to make future forecasts. However, when there are significant changes in demand, it may cause them to base their projections on incorrect information. This wrong projection can lead to an overestimated demand and an increase in inventory levels. Incorrect supply chain forecasts create a vicious cycle of overstocking and stockouts, leading to increased costs, reduced profitability, and damaged customer satisfaction. This inaccuracy also triggers the bullwhip effect, amplifying small errors up the supply chain into significant demand and supply imbalances.

Bell curve performance appraisal is a method used in Human Resources to evaluate employee performance. This system groups employees into different performance levels based on a distribution that resembles a bell-shaped curve. The bell curve performance appraisal method was made famous and widely adopted by Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric (GE), in the 1980s. Although the concept of the bell curve as a statistical distribution predates Welch’s use of it, his implementation at GE popularized its application in performance management. 

Many large organizations, particularly in the IT and banking sectors, have conventionally used bell curve-based performance appraisal systems. Examples include Infosys, Wipro, and ICICI Bank. Some public sector undertakings in India such as ONGC and SAIL, also use this method. In the Bell Curve system, a small percentage of employees are classified as top performers, the majority fall into the average category, and a small percentage are identified as nonachievers. The bell curve appraisal in HR helps organizations to systematically assess and rank their employees, ensuring that the distribution of performance ratings aligns with the expected parameters of mission and vision of the organization.

The bell curve is used to categorize employee performance and differentiate between top, average, and underperforming individuals. This system aims to ensure that a certain percentage of employees are in each category, which helps with reward systems, and performance improvement. HR departments use the bell curve performance appraisal to identify and compensate top performers, provide additional training and development for average performers, address ssues with underperformers through feedback and improvement plans. Therefore, this method is preferred by HR departments, promoting a culture of high performance and continuous improvement within the organization.

The bell curve was widely adopted, but now a days, several companies have moved away from it, including Google, Microsoft, and Adobe. These organizations have adopted more flexible performance management systems, focusing on individual strengths and development rather than strict groupings.  The bell curve adapts to strict parameters by maintaining a consistent shape and statistical properties when applied to various data sets. This means that regardless of the specific data being analysed, the bell curve will always be centred around the statistical mean, with most data points bundled around the central value and fewer points at the extremes. 

Employee performance distributions often resemble a bell-shaped curve due to several factors, including the inherent nature of human capabilities and the way performance is assessed. The bell curve, also known as a normal distribution, suggests that most individuals will fall within a certain range of performance, with fewer people at the extreme ends

Why does the Bell Curve Work in Performance Management?

Bell curve performance appraisal is a structured method used in performance management to categorize employees based on their performance. Managers assess the performance of their team members over a specific period. This evaluation is based on predefined criteria, such as meeting targets, demonstrating key competencies, and contributing to team objectives. Employees are then ranked from highest to lowest performance. This ranking is typically done by comparing individual performances relative to each other rather than against an absolute standard.

Distribution

The ranked employees are divided into different performance categories following the bell curve distribution: Top Performers (Top 10-20%): These employees exceed expectations and deliver exceptional results. Average Performers (Middle 60-80%): These employees meet the expected performance standards. Low Performers (Bottom 10-20%): These employees fall below expectations and need improvement.

Feedback and Development

Based on their ranking, employees receive feedback. Top performers may receive rewards and recognition, average performers get constructive feedback to maintain their performance, and low performers are given specific training and reskilling plans as additional support.

Objective Evaluation

The bell curve provides a structured and objective approach to evaluating employee performance by categorizing employees into predefined performance levels, it reduces biases and ensures fairness in assessments. This method helps in clearly distinguishing between top performers, average performers, and low performers. This differentiation is crucial for making notified decisions about promotions, rewards, and development needs. 

Motivation and Competition

By recognizing top performers, the bell curve fosters a competitive environment that motivates employees to excel. Knowing that outstanding performance will be rewarded encourages employees to strive for higher achievement. 

Resource Allocation

The bell curve helps organizations allocate resources effectively. Top performers can be given challenging projects and leadership roles, while underperformers can be provided with targeted training and support to improve. 

Consistency in Appraisals

Using a standardized method like the bell curve ensures consistency across departments and teams. This uniformity helps maintain a cohesive performance management in organization. For example, General Electric (GE) famously used the bell curve performance appraisal system to rank employees and drive performance improvements. By identifying the top 20% of performers, rewarding them, and addressing the bottom 10% through improvement plans or other measures, GE was able to maintain high standards of performance across the company. 

GE’s growth and success are often linked to the implementation of a performance management system that utilizes the bell curve, also known as a forced ranking or vitality curve. This system was championed by former CEO Jack Welch who assumed that employee performance must follow a normal distribution. A small percentage being high performers, the majority being average, and a smaller percentage being underperformers. By identifying and often removing underperformers, GE aimed to create a more efficient and high-performing workforce. These advantages make the bell curve performance appraisal a valuable tool for organizations seeking to enhance their performance management processes, ensuring that they recognize and nurture talent effectively. 

Adidas and Puma were founded by two German brothers, Adolf “Adi” and Rudolf Dassler, who were initially partners in a shoe-making business. Their company, Gebrüder Dassler Schuhfabrik – Dassler Brothers Shoe Factory achieved success. Adolf and Rudolf Dassler started their shoe business together in their mother’s laundry room in Herzogenaurach in 1924. They gained recognition at the 1936 Olympics. The best part is that the brothers initially found success with their athletic shoes.  

But their relationship worsened, leading to a bitter feud and the subsequent split. Adolf founded Adidas, while Rudolf founded Puma. The rift between the Dassler brothers, who founded Adidas and Puma, stemmed from a combination of personal and business-related issues. Their contrasting personalities, business philosophies, and a significant misunderstanding during an air raid incident in World War II all contributed to their falling out.

As with many families, even Dassler brothers had tension from their families. The brothers’ wives did not like each other and with operating and living in the same villa, it eventually came to a head during World War II when the Allies were bombing Herzogenaurach, their village. As Adolf and his wife climbed into a bomb shelter already occupied by Rudolf and his wife, he exclaimed, “The dirty bastards are back again,” referring to the Allied forces. Rudolf felt that the remark was directed at him and his family. But Adolf meant it for the Allied forces. The Allied forces in World War II were an international military alliance formed to oppose the Axis powers primarily Germany, Italy, and Japan. The principal members included the UK, US, Soviet Union and China.

World War II significantly reshaped the world by splitting it into two opposing ideological blocs: the Western, democratic, capitalist bloc led by the United States, and the Eastern, communist bloc led by the Soviet Union. This division, known as the cold war, changed the geopolitical scenario and political dynamics. Dassler brothers Businesses had differing views on the business which led to a growing rift between the brothers. Similarly in some other incident Rudolf also muttered some ugly remarks which were not meant for Adolf, but the misunderstanding kept brewing. Further powering the feud was Rudi’s recruitment into the German military and subsequent imprisonment by the Allies. He believed Adi and his wife were responsible for getting him recruited. 

In fact, the bothers could reign the world: Adolf Dassler was known for his focus on product innovation and technical design, while Rudolf Dassler was a Master of Marketing and sales. They could do wonders. But frequent disagreements and tension within the company, made them officially separated in 1924, with Adolf establishing Adidas and Rudolf founding Puma. Sadly, the brothers’ feud extended beyond their business, dividing their hometown and creating a fierce rivalry between the two brands that continues to this day. 

Adidas is strongly associated with football. It’s a global leader in the sport, sponsoring major tournaments like the FIFA World Cup, UEFA Champions Leagues  as well as top clubs and individual players. Adidas’s long history in football, from pioneering innovative boots to supplying official match balls, has cemented its iconic status in the sport. Lionel Messi and David Beckham were long-standing associations with the brand. 

Puma offers hiking and trail running shoes with features like NITRO Foam and PUMAGRIP Attire for traction, they are more widely recognized for their athletic footwear, apparel, and collaborations in football, running, and other sports. Puma’s Explore NITRO hiking shoes are a recent entry into the outdoor market, designed for various terrains. Puma is associated with a wide range of sports, including football, running, basketball, golf, and motorsport. They also have a strong presence in track and field and team sports like handball, rugby, and volleyball. Recently, Puma has also entered the badminton sport. Puma has several global brand ambassadors. Rosé from the South Korean girl group Blackpink is a global ambassador, representing the brand in various campaigns and storytelling. PV Sindhu, the Indian badminton player, is also a global ambassador, with India being the first country to promote badminton for Puma.

This is how the Dassler brothers’ rivalry gave the sports world two great brands, it gave innovative designs and opened a competitive landscape that continues to influence the industry.  The rivalry drove innovation leading to better products. Both Adidas and Puma are leading brand in sports world.

December is always a cheerful yet busy time of year no matter where you are in the world. You see lot of activities and festivities taking place. It is the last month of the year; people just want to enjoy it. The streets, gardens, churches, shops, and restaurants are lit up. The cool breeze has joie de vivre in it. It’s a great time to get away from home and travel somewhere to a different destination. I also like Christmas because there is an aroma in the air. More than 70% of human emotions are based on the smells. In addition, the memories of smells are saved in mind longer than visual or auditory one. The Christmas cookies, cakes, fudges, pudding and pastries add yummy smacking energy in the air. Aroma-marketing helps in increasing sales.

The pleasant smell of baked cookies and fresh-baked bread is inviting. The scent of new shoe leather or new sneakers is unforgettable; the floating aroma of freshly brewed coffee and tea is so tempting. Aromas are nurtured longer in mind and memory that is why lately the aroma-marketing (in hotels, restaurants, shops) is gaining momentum and helps to popularize the location. Aroma-marketing has a direct effect on the increasing of sales. Many major hotel or restaurant chains even “fix” a particular smell for them, for which they can be recognized.

Obviously, aroma-marketing in Christmas holidays is in demand. Favorites are the familiar scents of tangerine, pine needles, frosty freshness, peppermint, delicious pastries, sweet ginger cookies or chocolate Christmas cupcakes, the smell of chocolate and cocoa. In addition to a pleasant mood, according to the statistics, the customer loyalty increases by 20-25%.  Aroma-marketing on different markets increases sales by 7-27%, return visit to the outlets increases by 15-20%.

Marketers try to create real experience and stronger connections especially during the festivity like Christmas.  Today technology is plentiful and influences our daily life.  We have everything we need at our fingertips; we need not even step out of our homes, we get everything on our cell phones, tablets, and laptops at a click of button. But, during this time of the year, people prefer getting out from their cozy zones and like to experience the real shopping experience.

Creating sensory signatures across multiple senses in an integrated way multiplies the effects of individual sensory elements to create a bigger impression.  This is known as the multiplier effect in marketing.  By incorporating a festive mix of music, visually appealing décor, and nostalgic scents shops and restaurants invite customers.  The holistic effect is an authentic feast for the senses invites and influences holiday shoppers. Research has found that shoppers’ evaluations of stores tend to be highest at the time of year when festive music is being played, this effect enhances when the music is paired with festive scent. The research found that when music and scent were matching it makes a very positive effect on sales.

During the magical holiday season, where consumers are seeking ideas for gift purchases, retail experiences can attract shoppers into stores, inspire purchases, increase dwell time and create brand affiliation.  The opportunity to enhance a retail environment is never more appropriate, available, accepted and even expected. Consumers expect the experience of Christmas long before from end of November.   They are in festive mood and like to be nostalgic, excited.  The right experience can be a hidden persuader to the consumer with gifts to buy.

Christmas is a time of giving and sharing. It is a wonderful time of the year. From kids to older people wait for this time of the year because there is so much each one plans to do; listening to Christmas carols with a cup a cocoa is one that is matched by very few other things in life. Snuggling in a blanket with family and friends, and humming these tunes can cheer one up immensely. It encourages a feeling of closeness, and leads one to feelings of joy no matter even if someone has experienced few bad things in life.

Fairy lights and pretty decorations: New lights and fresh decorations mixed with old ones give a feeling of warmth and happiness. When these are up, everyone knows that Christmas is near, and this is enough to brighten even the gloomiest of moods. Decorating a tree is a pleasure worth experiencing in life; from draping garland, avoid branches bulging between tightly cinched garland strands between each wave. This joy is compounded when you know there is a gift waiting for you under the tree. Everyone likes to be pampered with a gift.

Family get-togethers:  This is the time when all your favorite near and dear ones gather. It is a feast time. With all the traditional dishes and sweets, the house full of festivities, and we feel like one big happy family. Yes, there is the occasional family drama, but hey, that’s what Christmas is all about. Forget all grudges, get it out of system.

Nothing evokes the holiday season like the invigorating smell of an authentic white pine and birch. The scent of fresh evergreens and crisp pine needles is stimulating also, thyme notes clear the mind and sharpen one’s focus. Colorful and lovely Orchids along with a warm message on post it note are so uplifting and relieve depression.  Warm apple cider spiced with cinnamon, clove, and whole peppercorns topped off with a subtle hint of orange peel creates cozy and nostalgic aroma.  Do you know, a lot of people think that cinnamon is the best scent of Christmas?  Another scent is cool peppermint – when it is balanced with warm, frothy vanilla it creates a comforting wintry aroma. This Christmas enjoy the aromas, pamper your senses.

Merry Christmas & Seasons Greetings to one and all!!!